So, you appear to be very concerned about the USA 'becoming the UK' - and you call this a 'Technocratic Win'.
Do you know how 'free speech' has been misused in the UK, on a daily basis, in order to cause all sorts of social disruptions and criminal behaviour?
Are you ready to accept that free speech, being conducted by bad actors, can cause unspeakable harms - specially when amplified by things like 'AI deep fakes' and fake or radicalised tweets?
Ironically, at the same time you appear to be calling for 'the right' of engaging on these... let's say... 'technocratic channels of social control' (such as social media) - to 'defend free speech' -you portray your views as being... anti-technocracy?
Can you see the contradictions here!?
You can't fight 'technocracy' and, at the same time, call for your audience to defend 'their rights' to engage on social media without any responsibility on sight. You are literally sending them to the mouth of the lion. Social Media is one of the main tools of social control- tools created by the same technocrats you appear to attack. Tools for power, not freedom.
It would be more honest to call for a 'Butlerian Jihad' - a luddite revival - and start telling your readers to STOP USING SOCIAL MEDIA all together. Including this webpage.
Perhaps read more books and consume less propaganda? Talk to your neighbours? Invite a stranger to your house and give hospitality instead of suspicion? Who knows this waay. you can lead people to some true spiritual enlightenment?
Reality check: those who control the media in the UK are all hostages of the infrastructures created by Silicon Valley & Co - and, as we all should know by now, many 'free speech defenders' are following nothing but 'deep state' guidelines. Such as Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk. This week the UK has fought agains the right of Elon Musk to produce and promote pornographic 'deep fakes' - do you really think this is a bad move?
From what I could learn: the more one call for 'free speech', the nastier the political repression becomes - usually towards decent people. The enemies of humanity wish to 'free' themselves from any strains in order to advocate openly their anti-human agenda more easily. Better avoid it all together and council people to do the same. That's how you break technocracy.
Love your books, but stop with this technocracy VS free speech nonsense.
In this scenario, Free-Speech is a result of technocratic control, not the opposite.
How funny...
So, you appear to be very concerned about the USA 'becoming the UK' - and you call this a 'Technocratic Win'.
Do you know how 'free speech' has been misused in the UK, on a daily basis, in order to cause all sorts of social disruptions and criminal behaviour?
Are you ready to accept that free speech, being conducted by bad actors, can cause unspeakable harms - specially when amplified by things like 'AI deep fakes' and fake or radicalised tweets?
Ironically, at the same time you appear to be calling for 'the right' of engaging on these... let's say... 'technocratic channels of social control' (such as social media) - to 'defend free speech' -you portray your views as being... anti-technocracy?
Can you see the contradictions here!?
You can't fight 'technocracy' and, at the same time, call for your audience to defend 'their rights' to engage on social media without any responsibility on sight. You are literally sending them to the mouth of the lion. Social Media is one of the main tools of social control- tools created by the same technocrats you appear to attack. Tools for power, not freedom.
It would be more honest to call for a 'Butlerian Jihad' - a luddite revival - and start telling your readers to STOP USING SOCIAL MEDIA all together. Including this webpage.
Perhaps read more books and consume less propaganda? Talk to your neighbours? Invite a stranger to your house and give hospitality instead of suspicion? Who knows this waay. you can lead people to some true spiritual enlightenment?
Reality check: those who control the media in the UK are all hostages of the infrastructures created by Silicon Valley & Co - and, as we all should know by now, many 'free speech defenders' are following nothing but 'deep state' guidelines. Such as Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk. This week the UK has fought agains the right of Elon Musk to produce and promote pornographic 'deep fakes' - do you really think this is a bad move?
From what I could learn: the more one call for 'free speech', the nastier the political repression becomes - usually towards decent people. The enemies of humanity wish to 'free' themselves from any strains in order to advocate openly their anti-human agenda more easily. Better avoid it all together and council people to do the same. That's how you break technocracy.
Love your books, but stop with this technocracy VS free speech nonsense.
In this scenario, Free-Speech is a result of technocratic control, not the opposite.